Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-03-01 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| S-LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z Force has an overall score of 75.8, which is a little bit better than HTC U Play's 73.5 overall score. Even though the Motorola Moto Z Force and HTC U Play were only released 6 months apart, the Motorola Moto Z Force construction is somewhat heavier but also a little thinner than HTC U Play.
The HTC U Play features just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z Force, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with 4 more cpu cores (although they are slower). The Motorola Moto Z Force has just a bit better looking screen than HTC U Play, because it has a better display density, a little bigger screen and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The Moto Z Force captures slightly better videos and photos than HTC U Play, because it has a lot better video definition, a way more MP camera and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and video. The Motorola Moto Z Force has a quite bigger storage to install applications and games than HTC U Play, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has more internal memory.
Moto Z Force has a really longer battery duration than HTC U Play, because it has a 3500mAh battery size.
Moto Z Force not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.