Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| 2017-03-01 | 2017-08-10 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition is just a bit better than the HTC U Play, having a 77.4 score against 73.5. Even though Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition and HTC U Play were released only a couple of months apart, Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition is a bit lighter and extremely thinner. The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bit better display than HTC U Play, because it has a better display pixel density, a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a little larger screen.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a bit better processing power than HTC U Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Moto Z2 Force Edition features just a bit better camera than HTC U Play, because although it has a camera in the back with a way worse 12 megapixels resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than HTC U Play, and although they both have a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has 64 GB internal storage. The Moto Z2 Force Edition has just a bit better battery life than HTC U Play, because it has a 2730mAh battery size.
Although Moto Z2 Force Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than HTC U Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HTC U Play. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Moto Z2 Force Edition, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the HTC U Play, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.