Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| 2017-03-01 | 2019-08-16 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Action has a general score of 78.5, which is just a bit better than HTC U Play's score of 73.5. The Motorola One Action construction is way newer than the HTC U Play's, although it's somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier. Motorola One Action features just a little better processing power than HTC U Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola One Action also has more RAM memory.
Motorola One Action has a little bit better display than HTC U Play, because it has a bigger screen, a quite higher number of pixels in each inch in the screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2520px resolution. Motorola One Action features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than HTC U Play, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Motorola One Action captures just a bit better pictures and videos than HTC U Play, because although it has a camera in the back with way less MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light images and video and a way higher (4K) video quality. The Motorola One Action counts with a much longer battery life than HTC U Play, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 2500mAh.
Motorola One Action is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.