Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| 2017-03-01 | 2019-05-15 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Vision is a little bit better than HTC U Play, having an 80.7 score against 73.5. Motorola One Vision's design is noticeably newer, but just a little bit thicker and heavier than HTC U Play. Motorola One Vision features a bit more vivid screen than HTC U Play, because it has a bigger display, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2520 and a just a bit better pixel density.
The Motorola One Vision features just a bit better performance than HTC U Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola One Vision also has a larger amount of RAM. The Motorola One Vision counts with a bigger memory capacity for apps and games than HTC U Play, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Motorola One Vision features a very superior battery lifetime than HTC U Play, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola One Vision shoots much better pictures and videos than HTC U Play, because it has a larger aperture, a much higher 3840x2160 video quality and a back camera with lot more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.