Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| S-LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has a general score of 87, which is better than HTC U Play's general score of 73.5. The Motorola razr (2020) is a incredibly heavier phone than HTC U Play, but they have the same thickness. The HTC U Play has a bit better looking display than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of display and a quite better 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit better processing power than HTC U Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM. The Motorola razr (2020) features just a bit more storage capacity for applications and games than HTC U Play, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Motorola razr (2020) captures way better photos and videos than HTC U Play, because it has a lot higher video definition, a way more MP back camera and a bigger aperture. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little better battery duration than HTC U Play, because it has 2800mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the HTC U Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC U Play. If you want to save some money, you can buy HTC U Play, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.