Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | -- |
| S-LCD | LTPO |
| 424 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is slightly better than HTC U Play, getting a 79.2 score against 73.5. Even though the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is way heavier than HTC U Play, it's a lot thinner and a lot newer. The HTC U Play has a much better screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lot smaller screen.
HTC U Play counts with a much better performing CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 13 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) captures greater photographs and videos than HTC U Play, because it has a camera in the back with a much better resolution, a way higher video resolution and a bigger aperture.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U Play, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a superior battery lifetime than HTC U Play, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.