Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2021-07-29 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | -- |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 is a bit better than HTC U Play, with an 80.8 score against 73.5. Nokia XR20's design is noticeably newer than the HTC U Play's, although it's thicker and extremely heavier. Nokia XR20 has a bit better CPU than HTC U Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Nokia XR20 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Nokia XR20 counts with a little sharper screen than HTC U Play, because although it has a little worse pixel count per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger display. The Nokia XR20 captures much better videos and photos than HTC U Play, and although they both have the same video quality, the Nokia XR20 also has a much better 48 MP resolution camera in the back, a larger aperture to capture better photos and video in low-light environments and better 60 fps video frame rates.
The Nokia XR20 has a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC U Play, because although it has an external memory slot that allows 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Nokia XR20 has a really longer battery duration than HTC U Play, because it has a 4630mAh battery capacity.
The Nokia XR20 is more expensive than the HTC U Play, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.