Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2020-05-21 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a general score of 77.7, which is a bit better than HTC U Play's global score of 73.5. OPPO Find X2 Neo's body is way newer and just a little thinner than HTC U Play's, but it is somewhat heavier. OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with just a little better hardware performance than HTC U Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has 9 GB more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a slightly better display than HTC U Play, because although it has a bit lower display density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a larger display. OPPO Find X2 Neo features a bit bigger storage to store more apps and games than HTC U Play, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a very superior battery performance than HTC U Play, because it has a 61 percent bigger battery capacity. OPPO Find X2 Neo takes a lot better photographs and videos than HTC U Play, because it has a larger camera aperture to capture better images in low light environments, a much better 3840x2160 video quality and a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.