Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2020-04-27 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A31 is much better than the HTC U Play, having an 81.3 score against 73.5. Galaxy A31's body is extremely newer, but noticeably heavier and just a little thicker than the HTC U Play. The HTC U Play and the Galaxy A31 both count with extremely similar screens, because although the Galaxy A31 has a just a little worse count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger screen.
Galaxy A31 counts with a CPU that is just as good as the HTC U Play one, and although the Galaxy A31 has a larger amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The HTC U Play features slightly more storage for games and applications than Galaxy A31, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A31 counts with a really longer battery performance than HTC U Play, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Galaxy A31 captures much better pictures and videos than HTC U Play, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same (Full HD) video definition and a F2 camera aperture, the Galaxy A31 also has a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.