Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2017-03-01 | -- |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.11 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 9.13 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A34 has an overall score of 82.9, which is better than the HTC U Play's 73.5 score. Galaxy A34's construction is notably thinner and incredibly lighter than the HTC U Play. Galaxy A34 counts with a screen that's just as good as the HTC U Play one, because although the Galaxy A34 has a just a bit worse display pixel density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bigger display.
HTC U Play features a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A34, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A34 counts with a bit better processor than HTC U Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A34 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A34 features a way better battery lifetime than HTC U Play, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Samsung Galaxy A34 shoots slightly better pictures and videos than HTC U Play, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light situations and a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.