Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has an overall score of 79.4, which is a bit better than the HTC U Play's score of 73.5. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G is a a lot newer device than HTC U Play, although it's just a little bit thicker and noticeably heavier. The Galaxy A35 5G counts with a little sharper screen than HTC U Play, because although it has a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a larger screen.
HTC U Play has a much greater memory for apps and games than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The HTC U Play features a much powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy A35 5G has a way better battery lifetime than HTC U Play, because it has a 100 percent bigger battery size. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a very superior camera than HTC U Play, because it has a much higher (4K) video definition, a larger aperture to take better images and videos in low light situations and a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.