Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| 2017-03-01 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is better than HTC U Play's 73.5 general score. Even though Samsung Galaxy A50 is somewhat heavier than the HTC U Play, it's just a bit thinner and also much newer. Galaxy A50 has just a bit better performance than HTC U Play, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A50 also has 1 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features a screen that is very similar to HTC U Play's display, because although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has a little worse pixel number in each inch of screen, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC U Play, because although it has an external memory slot that allows 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy A50 shoots better pictures and videos than HTC U Play, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Galaxy A50 also has a lot more mega pixels camera and a bigger aperture for better photos in poorly lited situations.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features a way better battery performance than HTC U Play, because it has a 60% larger battery capacity.
Galaxy A50 not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.