Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2019-12-27 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 has a general score of 85.5, which is much better than the HTC U Play's general score of 73.5. The Galaxy A51 is a heavier cellphone than the HTC U Play, but both of them are equally thin. Galaxy A51 has a screen that is very similar to the display in HTC U Play, because although the Galaxy A51 has a just a bit lower display pixels density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Galaxy A51 has a little better hardware performance than HTC U Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A51 also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy A51 takes much clearer photos and videos than HTC U Play, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy A51 also has a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
The Galaxy A51 has a better storage to install games and applications than HTC U Play, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A51 counts with a much better battery life than HTC U Play, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A51 not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.