Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is a lot better than the HTC U Play's 73.5 general score. The Galaxy A51 5G is a newer cellphone than HTC U Play, although it's just a little thicker and way heavier. Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit faster processor than HTC U Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G and HTC U Play count with incredibly similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a just a bit worse screen density, it also counts with a larger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a greater camera than HTC U Play, and although they both have a F2 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A51 5G also has a much higher (4K) video definition and a back camera with much more MP.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than HTC U Play, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that admits 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy A51 5G features a way better battery life than HTC U Play, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.