Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| 2017-03-01 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 is way better than HTC U Play, getting a general score of 90.7 against 73.5. The Samsung Galaxy A52 is a newer cellphone than the HTC U Play, although it is just a little thicker and noticeably heavier. Galaxy A52 counts with a little faster CPU than HTC U Play, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A52 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A52 and HTC U Play both count with really similar screens, because although the Galaxy A52 has a just a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a larger display and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Galaxy A52 features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than HTC U Play, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A52 features a very superior camera than HTC U Play, because it has a camera in the back with a lot better 64 mega-pixels resolution, a much better (4K) video definition and a bigger camera aperture to capture better images in low light environments. The Galaxy A52 features a superior battery performance than HTC U Play, because it has an 80 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.