Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is much better than the HTC U Play's general score of 73.5. The Galaxy A52 5G is a noticeably newer phone than the HTC U Play, but it is incredibly heavier and just a bit thicker. Galaxy A52 5G counts with just a bit better processing power than HTC U Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has more RAM.
Galaxy A52 5G has a display that's just as good as the HTC U Play one, because although the Galaxy A52 5G has a little lower amount of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger screen. Galaxy A52 5G has a greater camera than HTC U Play, because it has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light images and video, a way higher 3840x2160 video definition and a much higher resolution back camera.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than HTC U Play, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a much longer battery lifetime than HTC U Play, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 2500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.