Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s has a general score of 91.1, which is a lot better than the HTC U Play's general score of 73.5. Even though Galaxy A52s is extremely newer than the HTC U Play, it is a little bit thicker and noticeably heavier. Galaxy A52s features a display that is very similar to the HTC U Play one, because although the Galaxy A52s has a little bit lower display density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy A52s features a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than HTC U Play, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports 976 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy A52s features a little bit better processing power than HTC U Play, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A52s also has 3 GB more RAM.
Galaxy A52s shoots a lot better videos and photos than HTC U Play, because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition, a larger aperture to capture better low light photos and video and a camera with a much higher resolution. The Galaxy A52s has a superior battery performance than HTC U Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.