Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-03-01 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A70 has an overall score of 76.9, which is slightly better than HTC U Play's general score of 73.5. Galaxy A70 is a notably heavier phone than the HTC U Play, but both are equally thin. Galaxy A70 features a little faster processing unit than HTC U Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A70 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
HTC U Play counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A70, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a little worse 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a little bit better pixels amount per screen inch. The HTC U Play shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video definition.
The Galaxy A70 has a better memory capacity to install games and applications than HTC U Play, because although it has an external memory slot that allows 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A70 counts with a much longer battery performance than HTC U Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2500mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.