Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 is much better than HTC U Play, with an 87.5 score against 73.5. Galaxy A71's design is a lot newer and a bit thinner, but also somewhat heavier than HTC U Play. HTC U Play features just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixels density.
Galaxy A71 features a little bit better hardware performance than HTC U Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A71 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A71 has a very superior camera than HTC U Play, because it has a camera with a way better 64 mega pixels resolution, a bigger aperture and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 has a greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC U Play, because although it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A71 has a much better battery lifetime than HTC U Play, because it has an 80% greater battery capacity.
Galaxy A71 is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.