Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a global score of 92.9, which is way better than the HTC U Play's global score of 73.5. Even though the Galaxy A71 5G UW is much newer than the HTC U Play, it is a little thicker and extremely heavier. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a screen that is just as good as the HTC U Play one, because although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a quite worse quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much bigger storage to install games and applications than HTC U Play, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a bit superior processing unit than HTC U Play, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a very superior camera than HTC U Play, because it has a much higher video quality, a way more mega pixels camera and a larger camera aperture to capture better images and video in poorly lited environments. The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much better battery lifetime than HTC U Play, because it has an 80 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW costs a lot more than HTC U Play, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.