Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-03-01 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| S-LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is much better than HTC U Play, having a overall score of 97.6 against 73.5. Even though the Galaxy Fold is heavier than HTC U Play, it's thinner and extremely newer. The HTC U Play has a bit sharper display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a much lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater display density.
The Galaxy Fold features a lot bigger storage for applications and games than HTC U Play, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Galaxy Fold counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than HTC U Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a much longer battery duration than HTC U Play, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Fold shoots much better pictures and videos than HTC U Play, because although it has a camera with lot less mega-pixels, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a way larger aperture to take better low-light images.
The Galaxy Fold costs a lot more than the HTC U Play, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.