Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2017-03-01 | 2019-02-05 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M20 has an overall score of 78.9, which is just a bit better than HTC U Play's 73.5 score. Samsung Galaxy M20's design is newer than the HTC U Play's, but it's somewhat thicker and way heavier. The HTC U Play has just a little better performance than Galaxy M20, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The HTC U Play counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher pixel count per screen inch. The HTC U Play features a slightly bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy M20, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with a superior battery performance than HTC U Play, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The HTC U Play counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy M20, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for taking photographs and/or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the HTC U Play also counts with a more mega pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.