Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-03-01 | 2019-06-18 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M40 has a global score of 85, which is better than the HTC U Play's general score of 73.5. The Galaxy M40 construction has the same thickness than the HTC U Play, but it's heavier. The Galaxy M40 and HTC U Play count with incredibly similar displays, because although the Galaxy M40 has a just a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a larger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Galaxy M40 features a bit more powerful processor than HTC U Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy M40 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy M40 has a bigger storage for games and applications than HTC U Play, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy M40 counts with a superior camera than HTC U Play, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a larger diafragm aperture for better images and video in low light situations and a camera with much more mega-pixels. Samsung Galaxy M40 has a very superior battery duration than HTC U Play, because it has a 40 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.