Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2020-09-11 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 has an overall score of 87.7, which is much better than HTC U Play's score of 73.5. The Galaxy M51 is a much newer device than HTC U Play, but it's somewhat thicker and incredibly heavier. The HTC U Play counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a lot smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a little higher display density.
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a bit superior CPU than HTC U Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has 3 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a greater memory capacity for games and applications than HTC U Play, because although it has a SD memory slot that supports 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy M51 counts with a much better battery lifetime than HTC U Play, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy M51 has a lot better camera than HTC U Play, because it has a larger aperture, a way higher video definition and a back camera with way more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.