Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| 2017-03-01 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 is a lot better than HTC U Play, getting a 90.8 score against 73.5. Galaxy Note 20's body is a lot newer, but incredibly heavier and a little bit thicker than the HTC U Play. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit faster processor than HTC U Play, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a display that's just as good as the display in HTC U Play, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a just a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a better camera than HTC U Play, because although it has a camera with way less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light situations and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
HTC U Play counts with a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Note 20 has a way better battery performance than HTC U Play, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2500mAh.
The Galaxy Note 20 is way more expensive than the HTC U Play, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.