Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is way better than HTC U Play's 73.5 global score. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a extremely newer cellphone than HTC U Play, but it is heavier and just a little thicker. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little more vivid display than HTC U Play, because it has a way larger screen, a little greater pixel number in each display inch and a lot better 1440 x 3088 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit faster CPU than HTC U Play, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than HTC U Play, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes greater photographs and videos than HTC U Play, because it has a lot more MP back camera, a bigger diafragm aperture and a way better 7680x4320 video definition. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a very superior battery duration than HTC U Play, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more than HTC U Play, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.