Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| 2017-03-01 | 2017-07-07 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a little bit better than HTC U Play, getting a score of 80.4 against 73.5. Galaxy Note Fan Edition's construction has the same thickness than the HTC U Play, but it's somewhat heavier. Galaxy Note Fan Edition features just a little better processing power than HTC U Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has 1 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit more vivid screen than HTC U Play, because it has a bit larger screen, a little more pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The HTC U Play counts with a bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with longer battery life than HTC U Play, because it has a 3200mAh battery size. Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a slightly better camera than HTC U Play, because although it has a camera with much less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video definition and a larger camera aperture for better captures and video in low-light environments.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition is more expensive than the HTC U Play, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.