Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| 2017-03-01 | 2019-08-23 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 has a score of 89, which is a lot better than HTC U Play's overall score of 73.5. The Galaxy Note10 is a somewhat heavier device than HTC U Play, but both of them are equally thin. Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a display that's very similar to the HTC U Play one, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a just a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a bigger display.
Galaxy Note10 features a little bit better hardware performance than HTC U Play, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note10 counts with a little bit better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC U Play, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy Note10 shoots better photos and videos than HTC U Play, because although it has a lot lower 12 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a way higher video resolution and a lot larger camera aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited situations. The Galaxy Note10 has a much longer battery duration than HTC U Play, because it has a 40% more battery capacity.
Galaxy Note10 costs a lot more money than the HTC U Play, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.