Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| 2017-03-01 | 2014-09-29 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note4 has a score of 77.6, which is slightly better than the HTC U Play's general score of 73.5. Despite being the best in this review, Galaxy Note4's body is incredibly older, just a little bit thicker and heavier than HTC U Play. The Galaxy Note4 counts with a slightly better looking screen than HTC U Play, because it has a quite bigger screen, a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a bit better display density.
The HTC U Play features a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have equal 32 GB internal memory capacity, the HTC U Play also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. HTC U Play features a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Note4. They have 8 processing cores and 3 GB of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Note4 features longer battery duration than HTC U Play, because it has a 29% bigger battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note4 captures a bit better photographs and videos than HTC U Play, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have a back facing camera with a 16 MP, the Samsung Galaxy Note4 also counts with a much better (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.