Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| 2017-03-01 | 2016-08-02 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note7 is slightly better than HTC U Play, having a 79.5 score against 73.5. The Galaxy Note7 construction has the same thickness than HTC U Play, but it's heavier. HTC U Play counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores.
The Galaxy Note7 has a bit sharper screen than HTC U Play, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px, a little larger display and a little bit better screen pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy Note7 takes clearer videos and photos than HTC U Play, because although it has a back facing camera with a way lower 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and a way higher video resolution.
HTC U Play has more memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note7, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a superior battery performance than HTC U Play, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.