Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-03-01 | 2019-05-16 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is a lot better than HTC U Play, with a 93.6 score against 73.5. The Galaxy S10 5G is a a lot heavier cellphone than HTC U Play, but both are 0.31inches thick. Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than HTC U Play, because it has a larger screen, a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display and a much better 1440 x 3040px resolution.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit bigger storage to store more games and applications than HTC U Play, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Galaxy S10 5G features a bit superior CPU than HTC U Play, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S10 5G also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy S10 5G has a much better camera than HTC U Play, because although it has a lot less megapixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video resolution and a way larger aperture. Galaxy S10 5G has a much better battery lifetime than HTC U Play, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.