Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| 2017-03-01 | 2020-02-03 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a lot better than HTC U Play, having an 89.7 score against 73.5. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a way newer cellphone than the HTC U Play, although it is just a bit thicker and a lot heavier. Galaxy S10 Lite and HTC U Play have extremely similar displays, because although the Galaxy S10 Lite has a quite inferior count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than HTC U Play, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than HTC U Play, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has 5 GB more RAM.
Galaxy S10 Lite features a way better battery duration than HTC U Play, because it has an 80 percent larger battery size. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a lot better camera than HTC U Play, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a lot better video resolution and a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy S10 Lite is also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.