Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is way better than the HTC U Play, with a 93.4 score against 73.5. Although the Galaxy S22 is heavier than the HTC U Play, it's just a bit thinner and also way newer. Galaxy S22 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than HTC U Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a much better looking screen than HTC U Play, because although it has a little bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a larger screen. Samsung Galaxy S22 captures much clearer photos and videos than HTC U Play, because it has a larger camera aperture to take better low light photography and video, a back-facing camera with lot more MP and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality.
HTC U Play features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S22, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S22 has a very superior battery lifetime than HTC U Play, because it has a 3700mAh battery size.
Galaxy S22 is a lot more expensive than HTC U Play, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.