Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-03-01 | -- |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.11 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is much better than the HTC U Play, getting a score of 82.6 against 73.5. Galaxy S25 is a noticeably thinner and much lighter cellphone than HTC U Play. The HTC U Play features a much better performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a better looking display than HTC U Play, because although it has a little bit inferior pixel count per inch of screen, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy S25 takes greater photos and videos than HTC U Play, because it has a larger aperture for better photos and video in low-light situations, a much better video resolution and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The HTC U Play has a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S25, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy S25 counts with a much longer battery life than HTC U Play, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 costs a lot more than the HTC U Play, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.