Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-03-01 | -- |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.11 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is way better than the HTC U Play, with a overall score of 90.7 against 73.5. The Galaxy S25 Ultra construction is noticeably lighter and notably thinner than the HTC U Play. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a lot better looking screen than HTC U Play, because it has a way larger display, a just a little more pixels per inch of screen and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px.
HTC U Play has a much faster processor than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a little bit better storage capacity for games and applications than HTC U Play, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra captures much better photographs and videos than HTC U Play, because it has a way more mega-pixels back facing camera, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a larger aperture to take better low-light photography and videos. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better battery life than HTC U Play, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.