Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2022-06-29 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 9.13 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro is just a bit better than HTC U Play, getting a general score of 77.6 against 73.5. Although Galaxy XCover 6 Pro is much newer than HTC U Play, it's extremely heavier and way thicker. The HTC U Play has a much more powerful processing unit than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
HTC U Play has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a way smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the display. The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than HTC U Play, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a very superior battery lifetime than HTC U Play, because it has a 62% bigger battery size. The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a bit better camera than HTC U Play, because it has a lot better 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a bigger aperture to capture better photos in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.