Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a general score of 81, which is better than HTC U Play's 73.5 score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is newer than the HTC U Play, it's a lot heavier and incredibly thicker. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a display that is very similar to the HTC U Play one, because although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
HTC U Play features a little bit better memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little bit better hardware performance than HTC U Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a really longer battery performance than HTC U Play, because it has a 62 percent more battery size. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro shoots clearer photographs and videos than HTC U Play, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera and a larger aperture.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy XCover Pro is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.