Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is way better than HTC U Play's 73.5 global score. The Galaxy Z Flip construction is incredibly newer and just a little bit thinner than the HTC U Play's, although it is extremely heavier. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little more vivid display than HTC U Play, because it has a larger screen, a just a bit better pixel density and a little higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution.
Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC U Play, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage. Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better hardware performance than HTC U Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features longer battery duration than HTC U Play, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2500mAh. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip shoots much clearer pictures and videos than HTC U Play, because although it has a lot less mega-pixels camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low-light photography and a lot higher video quality.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the HTC U Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as HTC U Play. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy HTC U Play, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.