Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 9.13 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 is much better than HTC U Play, with an 85.6 score against 73.5. The Galaxy Z Flip 3 design is extremely newer and somewhat thinner than the HTC U Play's, although it is also incredibly heavier. Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit better screen than HTC U Play, because it has a little higher pixels density, a larger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636px.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a little better hardware performance than HTC U Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has more RAM. HTC U Play captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
HTC U Play counts with a superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has longer battery lifetime than HTC U Play, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 2500mAh.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a lot more expensive than the HTC U Play, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.