Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| S-LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than the HTC U Play, getting a 94.6 score against 73.5. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's design is notably newer and thinner than the HTC U Play's, although it is also a lot heavier. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a screen that's just as good as the display in HTC U Play, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a quite inferior pixel count per inch in the display, it also counts with a higher 1768 x 2208 pixels resolution and a much bigger display.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a bit bigger memory capacity for applications and games than HTC U Play, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit better processor than HTC U Play, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 9 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than HTC U Play, because it has an 80% bigger battery size. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots much better photographs and videos than HTC U Play, because although it has a much worse resolution camera, it also counts with a lot better video definition and a larger aperture to take better low light images and video.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 costs a lot more than HTC U Play, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.