Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2021-08-11 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 9.13 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 3 is much better than HTC U Play, getting a 90.6 score against 73.5. Even though Galaxy Z Fold 3 is extremely heavier than the HTC U Play, it's somewhat thinner and also much newer. Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a little better hardware performance than HTC U Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM.
HTC U Play counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way lower 1080 x 1920px resolution and a really smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater screen density. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has slightly more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC U Play, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
HTC U Play captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger camera aperture to take better low-light images and videos and a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a much longer battery life than HTC U Play, because it has a 76% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.