Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Sony |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2015-06-16 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| S-LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia Z4v is just a bit better than HTC U Play, having a overall score of 78.8 against 73.5. Even being the best cellphone in this review, the Xperia Z4v construction is older, just a little thicker and a bit heavier than HTC U Play. The Xperia Z4v features a little better hardware performance than HTC U Play, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores, the Xperia Z4v also has an extra graphics processing unit.
Sony Xperia Z4v counts with a much better display than HTC U Play, and although they both have a same size screen, the Sony Xperia Z4v also has a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a better amount of pixels per display inch. Xperia Z4v features a much better camera than HTC U Play, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Xperia Z4v also has a back facing camera with way more megapixels and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
HTC U Play counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia Z4v, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal memory capacity, the HTC U Play also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Xperia Z4v has improved battery life than HTC U Play, because it has a 20% more battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Sony Xperia Z4v is also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.