Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2020-05-08 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Blasting black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a general score of 90.1, which is much better than the HTC U Play's 73.5 score. Even though Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is much newer than HTC U Play, it is noticeably heavier and way thicker. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features just a little better performance than HTC U Play, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a little bit better display than HTC U Play, because it has a much better 1440 x 3120 resolution, a lot larger display and a little more pixels per inch in the screen. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a bit bigger storage for apps and games than HTC U Play, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a much better battery performance than HTC U Play, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2500mAh. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro captures much better pictures and videos than HTC U Play, because it has a lot better video definition, a lot better resolution camera and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.