Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 75.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-03-01 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 5.80 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2244 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3120mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 8 SE is a bit better than the HTC U Play, having a 75.9 score against 73.5. Even though the Xiaomi Mi 8 SE is heavier than HTC U Play, it's just a bit thinner and also newer. Xiaomi Mi 8 SE counts with a little better hardware performance than HTC U Play, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Xiaomi Mi 8 SE also has a higher amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Mi 8 SE features a slightly better looking display than HTC U Play, because although it has a quite worse display pixel density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2244 pixels resolution and a bit larger screen. Xiaomi Mi 8 SE captures clearer videos and photos than HTC U Play, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos and videos.
The HTC U Play counts with a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 8 SE, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Xiaomi Mi 8 SE has better battery performance than HTC U Play, because it has 3120mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.