Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-03-01 | 2019-04-15 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has an overall score of 81.4, which is better than the HTC U Play's score of 73.5. Even though the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE is just a little heavier than the HTC U Play, it's a bit thinner and also noticeably newer. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with a bit better hardware performance than HTC U Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also has 3 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE features a little more vivid display than HTC U Play, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a quite better pixels density and a bigger screen. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE counts with a very superior camera than HTC U Play, because it has a camera with much more mega-pixels, a larger aperture to take better photos and video in low-light environments and a much higher 3840x2160 video quality.
HTC U Play features a superior storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has greater battery duration than HTC U Play, because it has a 3070mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.