Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-03-01 | 2019-08-20 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is better than the HTC U Play, having a general score of 82.7 against 73.5. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro construction is a lot newer than HTC U Play's, although it is somewhat thicker and noticeably heavier. The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a slightly better display than HTC U Play, because although it has a just a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a larger display.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a bit faster processing unit than HTC U Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The HTC U Play features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro counts with a lot better camera than HTC U Play, because it has a larger camera aperture for better low-light photography, a way better resolution back camera and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a really longer battery lifetime than HTC U Play, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.