Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2024-07-19 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| S-LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is better than HTC U Play, having an 84.3 score against 73.5. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is a much newer and much thinner phone than the HTC U Play, but it is extremely heavier. HTC U Play has a very superior processing power than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has 9 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a much more vibrant screen than HTC U Play, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels count per inch of screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 2224 x 2488 pixels and a way bigger display. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 shoots much better pictures and videos than HTC U Play, because it has a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera, a much better video resolution and a bigger aperture to take better low light photos and video.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a bit bigger storage to install applications and games than HTC U Play, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a way better battery lifetime than HTC U Play, because it has a 104% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.