Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2020-05-09 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Glacier white, Midnight black and Nebula purple |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite has a score of 80.6, which is a bit better than the HTC U Play's 73.5 global score. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite's body is noticeably newer, but somewhat thicker and heavier than HTC U Play. The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a bit better performance than HTC U Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite also has more RAM.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite counts with a slightly better screen than HTC U Play, because although it has a little less pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px. HTC U Play features a way bigger memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite takes way better videos and photos than HTC U Play, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light environments and a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite features a very superior battery lifetime than HTC U Play, because it has a 110 percent larger battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheap compared to the HTC U Play, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.