Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2020-05-12 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is much better than HTC U Play, with a global score of 87.9 against 73.5. Although the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is incredibly newer than HTC U Play, it is heavier and thicker. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a bit more vivid display than HTC U Play, because although it has a just a little worse pixel count in each inch of screen, it also counts with a bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a bit better processor than HTC U Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a very superior camera than HTC U Play, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos and video and a camera with a much higher 64 MP resolution.
The HTC U Play features a much better storage for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a really longer battery life than HTC U Play, because it has a 4700mAh battery size instead of 2500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.