Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 87.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2021-03-27 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 6.91 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Arctic white, Deep Ocean blue and Night black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4520mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 6.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F3 is much better than the HTC U Play, with an 87.3 score against 73.5. The Xiaomi Poco F3 construction has the same thickness than the HTC U Play, but it's a lot heavier. Xiaomi Poco F3 has a better display than HTC U Play, because although it has a quite lower pixel density, it also counts with a larger display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Xiaomi Poco F3 features just a bit better hardware performance than HTC U Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Poco F3 also has 3 GB more RAM. HTC U Play has a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F3, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Xiaomi Poco F3 counts with a very superior battery duration than HTC U Play, because it has an 81% greater battery size. Xiaomi Poco F3 captures much better videos and photos than HTC U Play, because it has a back-facing camera with a much better resolution, a bigger aperture to capture better captures and videos in low-light environments and a much higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.